Description
Wisconsin is one of the few states where you don't actually have to be under the influence of marijuana to be prosecuted for OWI—all that matters is the presence of Delta-9 metabolite in your blood. As attorney Lauren Stuckert describes, any detectable amount is enough to secure a conviction. If you've been charged with a marijuana OWI, it's in your best interest to work with a defense lawyer who has hands-on experience with blood substance testing and knows how to raise a scientific defense in court.
View transcript
WEBVTT
00:00:07.183 --> 00:00:11.343
Marijuana cases
are becoming extremely common
00:00:11.458 --> 00:00:14.600
in the OWI world here in Wisconsin.
00:00:14.700 --> 00:00:18.892
We're one of the states,
one of the only states, frankly,
00:00:18.975 --> 00:00:23.142
where an individual doesn't have
to actually be under the influence
00:00:23.200 --> 00:00:26.550
of marijuana in order
to be prosecuted for it.
00:00:26.950 --> 00:00:31.317
An individual just has to have what's
considered to be a measurable amount
00:00:31.920 --> 00:00:36.558
of the Delta-9 metabolite
that's in marijuana in their blood.
00:00:37.150 --> 00:00:40.517
What's interesting is that
the legislature in Wisconsin
00:00:40.542 --> 00:00:45.008
has essentially given
the laboratories free-range to determine
00:00:45.033 --> 00:00:47.658
what that level of detection is.
00:00:48.417 --> 00:00:52.850
The level of detection
is 1.0 nanograms per milliliter.
00:00:53.160 --> 00:00:54.308
To put it in perspective,
00:00:54.309 --> 00:00:57.942
it's less than
a billionth of a grain of sand.
00:00:58.760 --> 00:01:03.492
Moreover, there is not
a single scientific, peer-reviewed study
00:01:03.742 --> 00:01:07.358
in the country
that would lend one to believe
00:01:07.367 --> 00:01:09.925
that an individual could be impaired
00:01:10.200 --> 00:01:13.925
or under the influence of marijuana
to the effect that it would
00:01:16.033 --> 00:01:20.475
cause a problem with their driving
or render them unsafe to drive.
00:01:20.800 --> 00:01:22.283
However, in Wisconsin,
00:01:22.284 --> 00:01:25.600
if it's in your blood,
you can be prosecuted for it.
00:01:26.008 --> 00:01:28.280
We're really seeing an upswing,
00:01:28.310 --> 00:01:32.742
despite a country
where a lot of other states
00:01:32.817 --> 00:01:35.750
are putting in different types of laws
00:01:35.882 --> 00:01:39.667
as marijuana becomes
more legal across the country.
00:01:39.775 --> 00:01:42.992
They're putting
in higher levels of detection,
00:01:43.092 --> 00:01:47.433
meaning different higher levels and limits
like 5 nanograms per milliliter
00:01:47.434 --> 00:01:48.800
in certain states,
00:01:49.158 --> 00:01:54.108
levels that would be more in line
with the level that someone's getting to
00:01:54.142 --> 00:01:55.550
to become impaired.
00:01:55.600 --> 00:01:57.867
Wisconsin just doesn't care about that.
00:01:58.592 --> 00:02:02.469
What's really scary
is that there's no difference
00:02:02.483 --> 00:02:07.042
in the way that these cases
are prosecuted from a penalty standpoint.
00:02:07.475 --> 00:02:12.383
The offense of operating with a restricted
controlled substance of marijuana
00:02:12.400 --> 00:02:16.605
or frankly, any drug,
the penalty exposure is identical
00:02:16.983 --> 00:02:19.183
to someone who's been prosecuted
00:02:19.200 --> 00:02:22.567
for operating with
a prohibited alcohol concentration,
00:02:22.617 --> 00:02:26.917
even if that alcohol concentration
is a really high number.
00:02:28.108 --> 00:02:34.225
It's extremely important that if you have
been arrested for and are being charged
00:02:34.300 --> 00:02:37.967
with any type of offense,
be it a first offense, second offense,
00:02:37.968 --> 00:02:41.192
third offense, or higher for drugs
00:02:41.217 --> 00:02:43.008
where they're alleging
controlled substance
00:02:43.033 --> 00:02:44.892
or restricted controlled substance,
00:02:44.933 --> 00:02:49.292
that you have a lawyer
that really understands the mechanics
00:02:49.407 --> 00:02:54.200
of scientific defenses that might exist
within the framework of your case.