Description
Wisconsin DUI defense attorney Andrew Mishlove specially developed coursework in blood testing and trial advocacy so other lawyers can get real experience in breaking down complex scientific concepts into clear language for the courtroom. Blood alcohol tests are notoriously unreliable, and you don't deserve to have bad science determine your future. Our attorneys know how to interpret results and which questions to ask to most effectively argue your case.
View transcript
WEBVTT
00:00:07.929 --> 00:00:09.386
Hi, I'm Andrew Mishlove.
00:00:09.486 --> 00:00:10.642
At Mishlove & Stuckert,
00:00:10.643 --> 00:00:14.143
we are Wisconsin's only true specialists
in drunk driving defense.
00:00:14.814 --> 00:00:18.599
I want to talk today about a course
that I have developed for lawyers.
00:00:18.600 --> 00:00:23.243
It's called Serious Science:
Blood Testing and Trial Advocacy.
00:00:23.244 --> 00:00:26.428
We offer it
at the University of Texas, Arlington,
00:00:26.829 --> 00:00:28.471
every summer for lawyers.
00:00:28.743 --> 00:00:31.943
What we do in this course,
which I put together and I direct—
00:00:32.543 --> 00:00:34.093
yes, I'm proud of that—
00:00:34.914 --> 00:00:36.871
we bring lawyers into the laboratory,
00:00:37.029 --> 00:00:38.986
we teach them about the science,
00:00:38.987 --> 00:00:41.685
we teach them
how to do the tests themselves.
00:00:41.686 --> 00:00:44.000
They put on their goggles,
they put on their lab coats,
00:00:44.001 --> 00:00:45.757
they put on their rubber gloves,
00:00:45.886 --> 00:00:50.643
and we actually have them conduct
blood alcohol and blood drug tests
00:00:50.714 --> 00:00:53.729
like the analysts in the state crime labs.
00:00:53.929 --> 00:00:56.086
That's a three-day part of the course.
00:00:56.087 --> 00:01:00.229
Then for the next three days,
we spend our time
00:01:00.300 --> 00:01:04.186
studying how to communicate
scientific concepts in the courtroom.
00:01:04.329 --> 00:01:07.962
We bring in focus groups,
we practice jury selection,
00:01:07.963 --> 00:01:12.012
we practice witness questioning
about scientific questions like,
00:01:12.129 --> 00:01:14.400
was the instrument properly calibrated?
00:01:14.401 --> 00:01:16.657
Was the sample handled properly?
00:01:16.900 --> 00:01:18.770
Was there an electrical malfunction?
00:01:18.771 --> 00:01:21.643
Is there something anomalous
about this test?
00:01:21.857 --> 00:01:27.257
My philosophy is that science is critical
in the courtroom in drunk driving cases,
00:01:27.258 --> 00:01:30.586
but you can't win a case
just by arguing science.
00:01:30.929 --> 00:01:33.614
Cases in courtrooms are human dramas.
00:01:33.680 --> 00:01:37.398
If it's a human drama
that involves bad science,
00:01:37.598 --> 00:01:39.800
then we've got a story to tell.
00:01:40.480 --> 00:01:42.514
If you need to have your story told,
00:01:42.515 --> 00:01:47.586
if there's bad science in your case
and you need to have that story told,
00:01:48.014 --> 00:01:50.878
come to Mishlove & Stuckert
because we're the experts at that,
00:01:50.879 --> 00:01:52.200
and we're here to help you.