Description
A good DUI defense lawyer must have a comprehensive understanding of blood and breath testing for alcohol and other controlled substances. At Mishlove and Stuckert, our Wisconsin defense attorneys take that a step further by educating other attorneys on these topics nationwide. We know the science—lab standards, documentation, interpreting results, potential sources of error—and use it to build strong, sound arguments on behalf of our clients.
View transcript
00:00:07.757 --> 00:00:11.243
I think something
that really sets our firm apart
00:00:11.244 --> 00:00:13.456
from the majority of other firms
00:00:13.457 --> 00:00:17.600
that practice this type
of operating under the influence law
00:00:18.071 --> 00:00:23.329
is our understanding of the science
as it relates to these types of cases.
00:00:24.114 --> 00:00:28.381
A lawyer simply
cannot adequately defend clients
00:00:28.382 --> 00:00:30.720
facing these types of charges
00:00:30.957 --> 00:00:34.900
if that lawyer
does not have an understanding
00:00:35.029 --> 00:00:36.555
of the foundational science
00:00:36.556 --> 00:00:40.429
as it relates to both
breath testing for alcohol
00:00:40.486 --> 00:00:42.943
and also blood testing for alcohol
00:00:43.071 --> 00:00:46.960
and other controlled substances
and restricted controlled substances.
00:00:47.086 --> 00:00:52.600
Andrew and I teach other lawyers
about these topics on a national level.
00:00:52.601 --> 00:00:57.813
We go all over the country
to teach lawyers about challenges
00:00:57.814 --> 00:01:02.242
that can be found in blood testing
for alcohol and other drugs.
00:01:02.300 --> 00:01:07.600
A lot of the cases that we take to trial
involve chemical defenses,
00:01:07.686 --> 00:01:12.886
where we are doing a straightforward
chemical defense challenge
00:01:12.887 --> 00:01:17.015
to either the breath test results
or the blood test results.
00:01:17.314 --> 00:01:20.829
I'm not saying that there's going
to be a defense in every single case.
00:01:20.830 --> 00:01:22.100
That's not how it works.
00:01:22.101 --> 00:01:24.614
But there are often defenses.
00:01:24.615 --> 00:01:27.200
If you don't have a lawyer
00:01:27.729 --> 00:01:31.228
who knows how to spot
those potential sources of error
00:01:31.229 --> 00:01:35.399
in the blood testing documents,
in the breath testing documents,
00:01:35.400 --> 00:01:39.480
then a lawyer simply
isn't doing the best they can do.
00:01:39.520 --> 00:01:45.300
It is, in my opinion,
mandatory that at the bare minimum,
00:01:45.514 --> 00:01:48.429
lawyers who are taking on
these types of cases
00:01:48.470 --> 00:01:52.414
are making sure
that they are obtaining the documentation
00:01:52.419 --> 00:01:55.557
from the Wisconsin State
Laboratory of Hygiene,
00:01:55.589 --> 00:01:57.169
from the State Crime Lab,
00:01:57.286 --> 00:02:00.600
from the chemical test section
at the Department of Transportation,
00:02:00.757 --> 00:02:02.800
all of those scientific documents
00:02:02.801 --> 00:02:07.086
as it relates to those blood test results
and those breath test results,
00:02:07.270 --> 00:02:09.400
and really scrutinizing them
00:02:09.626 --> 00:02:13.143
and trying to determine
are there red flags here,
00:02:13.144 --> 00:02:15.486
are there potential sources of error?